Internal Master with external slaves
Kevin Darcy
kcd at daimlerchrysler.com
Mon Jan 23 21:54:55 UTC 2006
We've had similar issues with our "hidden master" setup, and someone
here suggested it was because our machines are multi-homed, and
sometimes the NOTIFY packets come from an address which is unknown to a
given slave, and thus are rejected. If this is the root cause, it should
be fixable with some combination of notify-source and/or allow-notify,
but I haven't got around to it yet...
- Kevin
Gabriel Granger wrote:
>Hi All,
>
>I've been using Bind for a while and decided that it would be a good
>idea to move my master inside my private nat network. I've made my
>public master and slave servers both slaves to my internal master.
>Which for the most part works fine, the problem I'm having, is when I
>make changes on the master server it takes ages for the slaves to be
>notified and grab the update. Because I dont what the true location
>of my master specified anywhere in the zone I've set the start of my
>SOA as follows
>
>@ IN SOA ns0.pancentric.net. dns-
>admin.pancentric.com.
>
>which is what the WHOIS information shows, and I've told my slaves
>where the real master is. Having set this up, I'm now wondering if
>the way I've done this is wrong? or do I need to additionally specify
>other options to allow my slaves to update quicker?
>
>What is the best way of setting something like this up?
>
>Many thanks in advance,
>
>
>Gabe Granger
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
More information about the bind-users
mailing list