Help - Bind 9.3.2 die after run several days - new version unstable

[Alex Tang]

very bad , I upgrade the gcc to 3.4.2 and  re-complied the bind 9.3.2 by 64-bit and enable-large file support. then the bind die every 7hrs

please help help

bind 9.3.2 very very unstable

-----Original Message-----
From: bind-users-bounce at isc.org [mailto:bind-users-bounce at isc.org]On Behalf Of Alex Tang
Sent: Friday, March 31, 2006 10:22 AM
To: bind-users at isc.org; bind9-bugs at isc.org
Subject: RE: Help - Bind 9.3.2 die after run several days
Importance: High


Hi anybody

one more question, i checked out that the named was complied with 32bits

# file named
named:          ELF 32-bit MSB executable SPARC Version 1, dynamically linked, not stripped

anyone know how can i complied it with 64bit ?

thx very much



-----Original Message-----
From: bind-users-bounce at isc.org [mailto:bind-users-bounce at isc.org]On Behalf Of Alex Tang
Sent: Friday, March 31, 2006 9:51 AM
To: bind-users at isc.org; bind9-bugs at isc.org
Subject: RE: Help - Bind 9.3.2 die after run several days
Importance: High


Hi anybody

thx your reply, 

i  updated the patch to SunOS dns 5.8 Generic_117350-34 sun4u sparc SUNW,Sun-Fire-V210 yesterday 

but it dead last night when busy hour but cannot  find out any error from log too

bind9.3.2 seems to be unstable product




-----Original Message-----
From: bind-users-bounce at isc.org [mailto:bind-users-bounce at isc.org]On Behalf Of Tom Schmitt
Sent: Thursday, March 30, 2006 2:48 PM
To: bind-users at isc.org
Subject: Re: Help - Bind 9.3.2 die after run several days



> --- Ursprüngliche Nachricht ---
> Von: Chris Thompson <cet1 at hermes.cam.ac.uk>
> 
> On Mar 29 2006, Tom Schmitt wrote:
> >if your Solaris Kernel is KJP -17, than change to KJP -16.
> 
> It's pretty pointless to refer to the "kernel jumbo patch" without
> saying which patch sequence you are talking about. Solaris 8, in
> particular has had three (so far) kernel patch series:
> 
>    108528  up to -29
>    117000  up to -05
>    117350  up to -34 (to date)


I was referring to the 108528-sequence.


> In any case, the OP told you which kernel patch level he was at:
> 
> >> Server platform
> >> SunOS dns 5.8 Generic_108528-27 

I only know of a problem that was introduced with -17, which could lead the
bind to die. The problem didn't exist in -16. I don't know if the problem
was removed in one of the later KJP, but I think for the original-poster it
is worth a shot.


-- 
Bis zu 70% Ihrer Onlinekosten sparen: GMX SmartSurfer!
Kostenlos downloaden: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/smartsurfer