Bind 9.3.1 (Address Already in use!)

[Kevin Darcy]

Was PID 282 the process you started with the -g argument, or some other 
pre-existing process? Give us some context here. If it was your process, 
did you try making any queries to the loopback address? Did you get an 
answer? I know those look like fatal errors in the logs, but you can't 
believe everything you read in logs. If it works, it works, and then 
your only task -- if you choose to pursue it -- would be to find out why 
the log messages were erroneous.

                                                                         
                                       - Kevin

Otis Surratt Jr. wrote:

>Hello,
>
>My problem with the rndc key stuff is fixed :) I figured it out. But I 
>did a named -g and got this output:
>
>ns1# named -g
>25-Nov-2005 02:46:03.045 starting BIND 9.3.1 -g
>25-Nov-2005 02:46:03.045 found 1 CPU, using 1 worker thread
>25-Nov-2005 02:46:03.050 loading configuration from '/etc/namedb/named.conf'
>25-Nov-2005 02:46:03.066 listening on IPv4 interface lo0, 127.0.0.1#53
>25-Nov-2005 02:46:03.066 could not listen on UDP socket: address in use
>25-Nov-2005 02:46:03.066 creating IPv4 interface lo0 failed; interface 
>ignored
>25-Nov-2005 02:46:03.067 not listening on any interfaces
>25-Nov-2005 02:46:03.086 /etc/namedb/named.conf:119: couldn't add 
>command channel 127.0.0.1#953: address in use
>25-Nov-2005 02:46:03.086 ignoring config file logging statement due to 
>-g option
>25-Nov-2005 02:46:03.098 additionally listening on IPv4 interface lo0, 
>127.0.0.1#53
>25-Nov-2005 02:46:03.098 could not listen on UDP socket: address in use
>
>then I did a sockstat
>
>ns1# sockstat
>USER     COMMAND    PID   FD PROTO  LOCAL ADDRESS         FOREIGN ADDRESS
>otis     sshd       1360  3  stream -> ??
>otis     sshd       1360  5  tcp4   192.168.30.2:22       65.38.9.195:10004
>root     sshd       1357  4  stream -> ??
>root     sshd       1357  5  tcp4   192.168.30.2:22       65.38.9.195:10004
>root     inetd      475   4  tcp4   *:514                 *:*
>root     inetd      475   5  dgram  -> /var/run/logpriv
>smmsp    sendmail   417   3  dgram  -> /var/run/log
>root     sendmail   413   3  tcp4   127.0.0.1:25          *:*
>root     sendmail   413   4  dgram  -> /var/run/logpriv
>root     sshd       407   3  tcp6   *:22                  *:*
>root     sshd       407   4  tcp4   *:22                  *:*
>root     perl5.8.6  371   4  dgram  -> /var/run/log
>root     perl5.8.6  371   5  tcp4   *:10000               *:*
>root     perl5.8.6  371   6  udp4   *:10000               *:*
>root     rpcbind    292   4  udp6   *:*                   *:*
>root     rpcbind    292   5  stream /var/run/rpcbind.sock
>root     rpcbind    292   6  udp6   *:111                 *:*
>root     rpcbind    292   7  udp6   *:1023                *:*
>root     rpcbind    292   8  tcp6   *:111                 *:*
>root     rpcbind    292   9  udp4   *:111                 *:*
>root     rpcbind    292   10 udp4   *:875                 *:*
>root     rpcbind    292   11 tcp4   *:111                 *:*
>bind     named      282   3  dgram  -> /var/run/logpriv
>bind     named      282   20 udp4   127.0.0.1:53          *:*
>bind     named      282   21 tcp4   127.0.0.1:53          *:*
>bind     named      282   22 udp4   *:62763               *:*
>bind     named      282   23 udp6   *:62764               *:*
>bind     named      282   24 tcp4   127.0.0.1:953         *:*
>root     syslogd    267   3  dgram  /var/run/log
>root     syslogd    267   4  dgram  /var/run/logpriv
>root     syslogd    267   5  dgram  /var/run/log
>root     syslogd    267   6  dgram  /var/named/var/run/log
>root     syslogd    267   7  udp6   *:514                 *:*
>root     syslogd    267   8  udp4   *:514                 *:*
>root     devd       245   4  stream /var/run/devd.pipe
>
>Can someone tell me how to fix this problem. Bind doesn't work b/c it 
>can bind to an address! it says udp socket already in use!
>
>My named.conf is telling it to listen on 127.0.0.1 and the rndc.conf 
>says 127.0.0.1. I have tried using the actual network card address not 
>look. I had have a second card in the server still not look rndc doesn't 
>not see those address or something!
>
>
>
>-----------------------------------------
>Otis Surratt Jr. / otis at ocosa.com
>-----------------------------------------
>
>
>
>
>
>  
>