"Duplicate Zone Found" Error
Kevin Darcy
kcd at daimlerchrysler.com
Fri Mar 4 22:53:32 UTC 2005
Bulls, Steven R Mr SAIC wrote:
>>Greetings...
>>
>> I've hunted far and wide for an answer to this question and have
>>yet to get one...
>>
>> I have several /24 subnets that I have delegated and I have
>>begun to get 'duplicate zone found' errors when resolving the hosts at
>>places like dnsstuff_dot_com. Here is an example of the configuration
>>that is in the db file for the zone...
>>
>>$ORIGIN 1.214.in-addr.arpa.
>>.
>>
>>123 IN NS hasdmz03.ha.osd.mil.
>> IN NS densedns01.ha.osd.mil.
>>
>>206 IN NS hasdmz03.ha.osd.mil.
>> IN NS densedns01.ha.osd.mil.
>>
>> The 2 NS records are the delegated zones' name servers. The
>>error ONLY shows up if one of my servers redirects the query to one of
>>these servers. If my machines respond directly, the error is not
>>there. The problem is that sometimes resolving for the hosts on the
>>subnets simply doesn't work which does not allow the querying machine
>>to get access to the hosts (web sites). FWIW, I am running bind 9.2.3
>>on Solaris 8. Also, this configuration has been in place for quite a
>>while and just recently (mid-February) has the error reared its ugly
>>head. It all seems to coincide with an update of the DNS servers from
>>bind 9.2.1 to 9.2.3... (the first of February). =?
>>
>> Any clues??
>>
There is no such thing as "redirecting" zones from one set of servers to
another. Either a server is authoritative for a zone or it is not.
www.dnsreport.com highlights very clearly that the NS1.MED.OSD.MIL and
NS2.MED.OSD.MIL servers are "lame" for the 123.1.214.in-addr.arpa zone.
By "lame" it is meant that they are delegated the zone but are not
responding authoritatively for it. Those servers should either be
reconfigured as authoritative (master/slave) for the zone, or the
delegations should be changed to point to authoritative servers for the
zone.
"Duplicate zone found" appears to be a cryptic way for the
www.dnsstuff.com reverse-lookup tool to report a lame delegation error.
- Kevin
More information about the bind-users
mailing list