Gernerating more useful statistics from BIND 9

[James A Griffin]

G. Roderick Singleton wrote:
>On Thu, 2005-06-09 at 15:10 +0900, John Khoon wrote:
>  
>>SGVsbG8uDQpBcyB5b3Uga25vdywgc3RhdGlzdGljcyBmcm9tIEJJTkQgOCBhcmUgbW9yZSBkZXRh
>>aWxlZCB0aGFuIEJJTkQgOS4NCkkgbmVlZCBtb3JlIGRldGFpbGVkIHN0YXRpc3RpY3MgZnJvbSBC
>>SU5EOS4NCkNvdWxkIHlvdSB0ZWxsIG1lIGhvdyB0byBnZXQgbW9yZSB1c2VmdWwgc3RhdGlzdGlj
>>cyBmcm9tIEJJTkQgOSBhbmQgcHJvZ3JhbSBzb3VyY2U/DQpJZiBJIHdhbnQgdG8gcHJvZHVjZSB0
>>aGUgcHJvZ3JhbSBhYm91dCB0aGF0LCBob3cgY2FuIEkgbWFrZSBpdD8NCg0KLS0NCkpvaG4gS2hv
>>b24gPG1lbGRpbkBuYXZlci5jb20+
>>
>>    
>
>What is this? A real question or something else? If it is supposed to be
>a real question, please ask in english as this is the language of the
>list.
>  
It is base64 encoded text.  Here is the decoded message.

Hello.
As you know, statistics from BIND 8 are more detailed than BIND 9.
I need more detailed statistics from BIND9.
Could you tell me how to get more useful statistics from BIND 9 and 
program source?
If I want to produce the program about that, how can I make it?

--
John Khoon <meldin at naver.com>