fowarding vs named.ca

Brad Knowles brad at stop.mail-abuse.org
Fri Jul 8 20:26:17 UTC 2005


At 3:38 PM -0400 2005-07-08, Jim Popovitch wrote:

>  I have a remote caching bind instance that resolves via forwarders (from
>  another cache) for local lookups.  This works fine, expect for the times
>  that the upstream forwarders go MIA.  Is there a way to use named.ca
>  (roots) as a last resort if all forwarders are un-responsive?

	The root nameservers do not do recursion.  You can't use them as 
forwarders.

>  Additionally, is there a way to go to the roots if the forwarders return
>  no result?

	Nope.

-- 
Brad Knowles, <brad at stop.mail-abuse.org>

"Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little
temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety."

     -- Benjamin Franklin (1706-1790), reply of the Pennsylvania
     Assembly to the Governor, November 11, 1755

   SAGE member since 1995.  See <http://www.sage.org/> for more info.



More information about the bind-users mailing list