preventing "update denied" (was 9.3.1 logging)

[Doug Barton]

Danny Thomas wrote:

> I remeber several people recommending a similar approach in the years
> since AD was released. Often the suggestion has been to use a name
> resolving to localhost or some unreachable address, or even a host
> that won't run a name-server, but we think it slightly cleaner having 
> the mname simply not resolving to an A/AAAA record.

That's an interesting idea, but I am wondering what kind of testing you've 
done, particularly with various vintages of windows clients, and what the 
differences are between the two approaches from the client behavior standpoint.

Doug


-- 

	If you're never wrong, you're not trying hard enough