BIND vs. DNS

[AR464 at daimlerchrysler.com]

Is the recent DNS Cache Poisoning issue not big enough?
http://isc.sans.org/diary.php?date=2005-03-31

Andrew Roberts, HNS
NAFTA DNS-DHCP Team
ar464 at dcx.com





dwallow at yahoo.com 
Sent by: bind-users-bounce at isc.org
04/07/2005 03:46 PM

To
comp-protocols-dns-bind at isc.org
cc

Subject
BIND vs. DNS






Management where I work is adamant about replacing a pair of aging F5
3DNS servers with Microsoft DNS. There are a few of us here who know
this is a bad idea. Management is unwilling to change their stance
unless I can come up with documented proof that there is a better
solution. After hours of searching Google and getting nowhere I thought
I try news groups and forums looking for help. I need facts and
figures, documented proof that Bind running on some flavor of Unix is a
better solution for external DNS then Microsoft. If someone can provide
me with documentation or URLs it would be much appreciated.

Thanks for any help you can provide