One Reverse Lookup Zone for Serveral Subnets?

[phn at icke-reklam.ipsec.nu]

atze <atze.nospam at arcor.de> wrote:
> Kevin Darcy wrote:

>> atze wrote:
>>=20
>>=20
>>>Hi Guys,
>>>
>>>Maybe someone here can help with this, I have created 2 Bind9 Slave=20
>>>Zones, the Master is a Windows 2k Server.
>>>
>>>In this we have the subnets 10.0.0.0/20 and 10.49.0.0/20, and 2 DNS Do=
mains.
>>>
>>>This are 3 Zones on Windows , 2 For the DNS Domains and 1 Reverse Look=
up
>>>for all Zones.
>>>
>>>The 2 DNS Domain Slave Zones working good, but however the Reverse=20
>>>Lookup isn't working.
>>>
>>>I also tried to make a Slave Zone from the Reverse Lookup Zone on=20
>>>Windows, this seems first to be working, but now no more.
>>>
>>>How can I create one Reverse Lookup for the whole 10.x.x.x  Subnet?
>>>Bind says that i must put in 3 Digit Numbers.
>>>
>>=20
>> Nonsense. Where does BIND say this? I'm sure you can create a=20
>> 10.in-addr.arpa on the Windows side. In fact, you *should* do this=20
>> anyway, so that if someone accidentally mistypes an address (e.g.=20
>> 10.94.x.x instead of 10.49.x.x), the bogus query doesn't go out to the=
=20
>> Internet or god-knows-where.

> The stupid Red Hat Bind Config Tool says it, ok then I leave the=20
> graphical shit, and configure it manually. Otherwise I waste my time I=20
> think.

Yes, you waste your time using redhats config tool.
Make shure it's completley disabled so it won't overwrite your
configuration.


--=20
Peter H=E5kanson        =20
        IPSec  Sverige      ( At Gothenburg Riverside )
           Sorry about my e-mail address, but i'm trying to keep spam out=
,
	   remove "icke-reklam" if you feel for mailing me. Thanx.