subdomain problem...

[Michael Varre]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

> -----Original Message-----
> From: bind-users-bounce at isc.org 
> [mailto:bind-users-bounce at isc.org] On Behalf Of Michelle Konzack
> Sent: Thursday, September 09, 2004 2:20 PM
> To: bind-users at isc.org
> Subject: Re: subdomain problem...
> 
> **************************************************************
> ***********
> * Do not Cc: me, because I am on THIS list, if I write here   
>           *
> * Keine Cc: am mich senden, bin auf DIESER Liste wenn ich 
> hier schreibe *
> **************************************************************
> ***********
> 
> Hello Michael, 
> 
> Am 2004-09-09 13:59:22, schrieb Michael Varre:
> 
> > Ok, looking below at your current config I think I understand
> > your  question a bit better now.  You want to create a sub such 
> that it is 
> > something.somethingelse.yourdomain.com.
> > 
> > The simplest way, unless you have a reason to do it otherwise is
> > to add:  
> > router                  IN      A       192.168.1.1
> > Router.soemthing		IN      A       192.168.1.2
> > Router.something.else   IN      A       192.168.1.3
> 
> I have had this (Asking for some month) and my 'apache' and 
> 'couier' was stop working

Hrm, not sure how this would have any affect on these services.  As
long as a name resolves courier and apache shouldn't care (they
actually shouldn't care otherwise either).

> 
> 
> > I've used this method for simple naming purposes, not as a 
> delegation
> > method. From looking at your files below it looks like this
> > method will suffice just fine.
> 
> Sorry, but for me this is not only to get a "working network" 
> which works fine since years without DNS-Server. I NEED to 
> learn more about bind9 because I am in cration of a new 
> Enterprise in Morocco .
> 
> I have the need to solv the problem :-)

Learning is great - I love learning :) but I guess I'm not sure what
you are trying to accomplish here.  Seems like you want to break up
your subdomains into their own zone records - do you really have a
need to do this other than for sake of learning? (<-good enough
reason I suppose) I run DNS for several medium sized companies and
there are many, many features in BIND I have no absolutely no use
for, and thus don't use, and my stuff runs properly and secure - at
least so far :)  

If you really do have a need for this, perhaps someone else on the
list can shed some light on accomplishing this task because I'm not
sure I'd be of much help beyond this point. 

Good luck
mv


> 
> 
> > Hope this helps
> > 
> > mv
> 
> 
> Greetings
> Michelle
> 
> -- 
> Linux-User #280138 with the Linux Counter, http://counter.li.org/ 
> Michelle Konzack   Apt. 917                  ICQ #328449886
>                    50, rue de Soultz         MSM LinuxMichi
> 0033/3/88452356    67100 Strasbourg/France   IRC #Debian
> (irc.icq.com)  
> 
> -- Attached file included as plaintext by Ecartis --
> -- File: signature.pgp
> -- Desc: Digital signature
> 
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
> 
> iD8DBQFBQJ7RC0FPBMSS+BIRAgRTAJ9cKAWwAXXY/IG2eilXdMTMDhXwQACfRr8R
> ZKRk6C17KuIkGYzPMOxL+R0=
> =PCNc
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> 
> 
> 

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 8.1

iQA/AwUBQUCl6UYhBmUvDNxOEQKUywCgj19r0ORNNt7NcjYLagkbzpsZejQAoLTI
XM/OfOVhIQjesax6fcU3nivS
=jw2A
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----