SOA and NS are canonical records?

[phn at icke-reklam.ipsec.nu]

June <nfbz2003 at yahoo.com> wrote:
> thanks for the reply.

> Is there any reference says SOA and NS RRs both are canonical names? Or all
> RRs, except CNAME (alias), are canonical names, by definition?

Yes, rfc 1035

> "The issue is what the "key" of this line is, the leftmost part." What do
> mean by saying this? Do you mean "interior node" is the leftmost part?

Looking at the terminonlogy used in rfc1035 :
NAME            an owner name, i.e., the name of the node to which this
                resource record pertains.






-- 
Peter Håkanson         
        IPSec  Sverige      ( At Gothenburg Riverside )
           Sorry about my e-mail address, but i'm trying to keep spam out,
	   remove "icke-reklam" if you feel for mailing me. Thanx.