Non-local DNS resolution question

Ladislav Vobr lvobr at ies.etisalat.ae
Tue Jun 15 04:50:19 UTC 2004


> Has the implementation of stub zones changed?  When I first looked at it 
> (back in BIND 4 days), it performed a zone transfer, but ignored 
> everything but the SOA and NS records.  So the zone-transfer overhead 
> was the same.  I'm also not sure that it looked at nested NS records 
> within the zone; I thought it only cared about the ones at the zone apex.

In bind 8,9 it queries only for normal SOA record and than for NS 
records, it uses TCP to query for NS records, while UDP for SOA records, 
  but it doesn't do a zone transfer, in fact I am using it with 
tranfer-allowed { none; };

Ladislav





More information about the bind-users mailing list