'dig -t any ...' question : *ANSWER* & *GLUE* credibility discrepancies
Jim Reid
jim at rfc1035.com
Sun Jun 13 13:34:27 UTC 2004
>>>>> "Ladislav" == Ladislav Vobr <lvobr at ies.etisalat.ae> writes:
Ladislav> It does, jim, and I have to say it, your reply is
Ladislav> incorrect, bind 8.3.4 and 9.3.0beta4 and 9.2.3 all of
Ladislav> these are reluctant to provide the answers to recursive
Ladislav> client if it cached with credibility *glue*.
If that's the case, please explain why my BIND9.3 server is perfectly
happy to return the glue it got for fake1.ladislav.name.ae after it
had cached a referral for ladislav.name.ae. That was clearly shown in
my earlier posting.
Ladislav> I have done some troubleshooting, and seems that there
Ladislav> are discrepancies amongst different bind servers how
Ladislav> they treat non-authoritative records let's call it glue,
No, let's call it "non-authoritative records". Glue is a specific
technical term that has a specific meaning.
Anyway, I'm not continuing this discussion as I've got nothing to add
to what I've already said.
More information about the bind-users
mailing list