Is this possible
Kevin Darcy
kcd at daimlerchrysler.com
Wed Feb 25 00:06:11 UTC 2004
Robb Edge wrote:
>In the final stages of Active Directory planning, but one thing that keeps
>nagging me is DNS.
>Currently run Bind on VMS for all our DNS needs.
>Planning to run the DNS on a W2K3 server for the active directory
>requirements and to stop Bind from getting all the updates.
>Adding NS entries to bind for the 4 zones i need to delegate to the 2K3
>server.
>This also helps in that i dont have to go round re-configuring all my
>desktop's with new DNS servers.
>Now the niggling bit.
>When i finish i'll have 1 AD dns server, which is fine and dandy till it
>falls over at which point i'm stuffed.
>If i set up a 2nd 2K3 server with DNS and have it as a secondary zone, what
>do ineed to add to Bind so that clients will see it if i loose the master
>zone?
>
This isn't really a BIND question at all. Client (stub) resolver
failover is dictated by the contents of the resolver configuration,
either /etc/resolv.conf (on Unix boxes), whatever is plugged into the
registry (for Wintel) and/or whatever the client configures dynamically
via DHCP options.
If you have non-authoritative nameservers in your environment, however,
you should make sure to include the appropriate NS records in the
relevant zones, so that nameserver-to-nameserver (iterative resolution)
failover and/or load-balancing will operate correctly.
- Kevin
More information about the bind-users
mailing list