More than 900 selective Forwarders

[phn at icke-reklam.ipsec.nu]

Martin Schor <schor at genesiscom.ch> wrote:
> Hi

> I'm currently planning a new DNS Concept which has some complexity.
> Now the following question came up: Is there a limitation of the number of
> selective forwarders BIND can handle? I should use more than 900 of them! In
> my understanding selective forwarders are nothing else than zone statements,
> if this is the case I can't think of a reason why this number of zone
> statements shouldn't be possible. Or are the selective forwarders treated
> different? Has anybody experience with such a high number of selective
> forwarders?

> Regards

> Martin

This sounds dangerous and hard to administer. Hardly a KISS solution.


-- 
Peter Håkanson         
        IPSec  Sverige      ( At Gothenburg Riverside )
           Sorry about my e-mail address, but i'm trying to keep spam out,
	   remove "icke-reklam" if you feel for mailing me. Thanx.