The byzantine convolutions of RFC 2317-style delegation
Jonathan de Boyne Pollard
J.deBoynePollard at Tesco.NET
Fri Aug 6 16:43:28 UTC 2004
SH> In the zone 12.12.12.in-addr.arpa, there must be a pointer which
SH> delegates the record to your nameserver :
SH> 128 PTR 128.128-255.12.12.12.in-addr.arpa.
No. In RFC 2317-style delegation there should be a *client-side alias*
that re-maps the original name to one with the extra "128-255" label in
it, and a *delegation* of "128-255.12.12.12.in-addr.arpa.". A "PTR"
resource record is exactly what there *shouldn't* be.
SH> There is actually an RFC for doing just this, but it's number
escapes me.
That's probably a good thing. You should thank your lucky stars. (-:
<URL:http://homepages.tesco.net./~J.deBoynePollard/FGA/avoid-rfc-2317-delegation.html>
More information about the bind-users
mailing list