If secondairy DNS fails..........

[Riemer Palstra]

On Fri, Jul 30, 2004 at 10:32:09AM +0200, Quarco wrote:
> So, my question: are there _always_ at least 2 DNS servers needed for
> a domain to be resolvable?

That would be kind of useless in terms of redudancy, if you needed to
have both of your nameservers up all of the time (would be a perfect
situation though). One nameserver serving up your domains should be
enough to at least keep them running, although lookups could take a bit
longer.

> Or have I mis-configured something???

I'm afraid so, but can't say much without you mentioning the specific
names and nameservers :)

-- 
Riemer Palstra
riemer at palstra.com