delegation-only can break .name
Ladislav Vobr
lvobr at ies.etisalat.ae
Sat Oct 11 02:45:21 UTC 2003
Jeremy_Powell at sbcss.k12.ca.us wrote:
> Isn't this what the excludes part of the
> root-delegation-only is meant for. However,
> I have wondered since the introduction of
> root-delegation-only why it did not default
> to none with an include list rather than
> default to all with an exclude list?
this seems to me to be definitely better approach.
Ladislav
More information about the bind-users
mailing list