Redhat 6 Bind/Wink 2k IIS DHCP
Barry Margolin
barry.margolin at level3.com
Mon Nov 3 23:10:26 UTC 2003
In article <bo6n29$2mkq$1 at sf1.isc.org>, <Mark_Andrews at isc.org> wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Is it possible to use a NAT for DNS? I have a redhat 6 box with bind
>> on it. I am not sure the version. I was thrown in the middle of this
>> so please bear with me.
>>
>> I have setup a NAT with our ISP to point my DNS's public IP to a
>> private one behind our firewall. I then set the DNS server with a
>> private IP. My question is can my DNS server still be seen by the
>> world with using NAT? I punched the appropriate holes in the firewall
>> for it.
>>
>> TIA
>
> It depends upon whether your NAT munges the DNS content or
> not. Some do, some don't.
And some do both. I think PIX performs translation in ordinary queries,
but not in zone transfers. This gets pretty confusing; I've noticed
private addresses in the zone files on our slave servers, but when I
manually query the customer's master I see public addresses.
--
Barry Margolin, barry.margolin at level3.com
Level(3), Woburn, MA
*** DON'T SEND TECHNICAL QUESTIONS DIRECTLY TO ME, post them to newsgroups.
Please DON'T copy followups to me -- I'll assume it wasn't posted to the group.
More information about the bind-users
mailing list