Recent problems with Reverse DNS.

[Brett Simpson]

On Wednesday 13 August 2003 04:02 pm, Kevin Darcy wrote:
> Well, technically RFC 1918 only reserved 172.16/12. You could end up
> accidentally blinding yourself to legitimate reverse lookups if you define
> 172.in-addr.arpa.

Does that also apply to using 168.192.in-addr.arpa?