953: address not available [BIND 9.2.1]

Danny Mayer mayer at gis.net
Wed Nov 20 22:55:47 UTC 2002


At 12:33 PM 11/20/02, Nate Campi wrote:
>On Wed, Nov 20, 2002 at 10:48:22AM +0100, Yaro wrote:
> >
> > after starting named I got this two lines /var/adm/messages:
> >
> > Nov 20 10:44:01 server named[28690]: [ID 866145 daemon.notice] command
> > channel listening on 127.0.0.1#953
> > Nov 20 10:44:01 server named[28690]: [ID 866145 daemon.notice] couldn't add
> > command channel ::1#953: address not available
> >
> > what should I do to avoid this?

It looks like you specified localhost for the key.  If you specify 127.0.0.1
then you won't get the second message. The first message is fine. It
looks like you build BIND with IPv6 support but you don't have it
running on this machine.

>Are these all the messages? You don't have a rndc key set up. Run
>'rndc-confgen -a' again and type until it tells you to stop. Then if you
>have an /etc/rndc.key ('rndc-confgen -a' does this for you) and a proper
>controls statement in named.conf, named and rndc should auto-negotiate a
>control channel between them.

That's not necessary. The problem is with lack of IPv6 stack on the
machine.

Danny
>--
>Nate Campi   http://www.campin.net
>
>"Usenet isn't a right. It's a right, a left, and a swift uppercut to the
>jaw."  -Computer Museum (Boston)
>
>
>-- Attached file included as plaintext by Ecartis --
>
>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
>Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
>
>iD8DBQE928dWWpDEZMF673kRAmunAJ47u3XqGe1H8Cg/a2MrVmnoWBM4ZQCfTbY4
>hV+8LGVuST2ZygDeZfEUXDg=
>=Kc03
>-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>



More information about the bind-users mailing list