RNDC major problem (need help)

[Eric Allard]

I recompiled my bind 9.2.1 on solaris 8 with gcc 2.95.3 and I get the 
same problem with the rndc dumpdb.
The process hanged.

Here a part of the command with a truss:

alexis{root}159: truss ./rndc dumpdb
.
.
.
connect(5, 0xFF0F1BF0, 16, 1)                   = 0
recvmsg(5, 0xFF0F1928, 0)                       Err#11 EAGAIN
poll(0xFF1F1AE0, 1, -1)                         = 1
write(4, "\0\0\005FFFFFFFD", 8)                 = 8
sendmsg(5, 0xFF0F1998, 0)                       = 148
read(3, "\0\0\005FFFFFFFD", 8)                  = 8
read(3, 0xFF1F1B00, 8)                          Err#11 EAGAIN
door_return(0x00000000, 0, 0x00000000, 0)       = 0
mmap(0x00000000, 24576, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, 
MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_NORESERVE|MAP_ANON, -1, 0) = 0xFF0D0000
mprotect(0xFF0D0000, 8192, PROT_NONE)           = 0
lwp_create(0xFF1D59E0, LWP_DETACHED|LWP_SUSPENDED, 0xFF0D5DB4) = 5
lwp_create()    (returning as new lwp ...)      = 0
lwp_continue(5)                                 = 0
lwp_schedctl(SC_STATE|SC_BLOCK, -1, 0xFF0D5CB4) = 0
lwp_schedctl(SC_DOOR, 0, 0x00000000)            = 6
door_bind(6)                                    = 0
sigaction(SIGWAITING, 0xFF26EE58, 0x00000000)   = 0
close(6)                                        = 0
time()                                          = 1027592671
poll(0xFF1F1AD0, 2, -1)         (sleeping...)
signotifywait()                 (sleeping...)
lwp_sema_wait(0xFF0F1E30)       (sleeping...)
lwp_cond_wait(0xFF2755A0, 0xFF2755B0, 0xFF1D5BF0) (sleeping...)
door_return(0x00000000, 0, 0x00000000, 0) (sleeping...)

Is someone who know what could be the problem?

Regards, Eric!


Pete Ehlke wrote:

>On Tue, Jul 23, 2002 at 03:11:43PM -0400, Eric Allard wrote:
>
>>I didn't get anything in my logfiles. It blocks on writing the dump file.
>>It begin to write the dump file and then stop. I get only the begining
>>of the file.
>>
>>I use solaris 8 on sun and compiled with gcc 3.0.
>>
>In my experience, gcc 3.0 produces at best dodgey results. Using it to
>built your mission-critical tools is probably ill-advised. 2.95.2 and
>2.95.3 build BIND just fine; I'd suggest rebuilding with a compiler that
>works. If your problem persists, truss named when it's choking and see
>what it's trying to do.
>
>-Pete
>