Max CNAMES rec. with BIND 8?

Chris Davis chris.davis at computerjobs.com
Thu Feb 28 19:27:33 UTC 2002


Pardon me!  You are correct. 

At least I have provided a stellar example of why not to.

Christopher Davis
Site Engineer
ComputerJobs.com
Upgrade Your Future
http://www.computerjobs.com


-----Original Message-----
From: Kevin Darcy [mailto:kcd at daimlerchrysler.com]

No. "multiple-cnames" allows the same *alias* to point to multiple
*targets*, a blatant RFC violation. This is the opposite of what the
original poster asked about.


- Kevin





More information about the bind-users mailing list