Memory Reduction

[Frank]

Am Die, 2002-08-20 um 23.47 schrieb Mark.Andrews at isc.org:
>=20
> > Am Die, 2002-08-20 um 23.03 schrieb Mark.Andrews at isc.org:
> > >=20
> > > 	If you want to control the cache size use "max-cache-size".
> > >=20
> > > 	Note: this does *not* cover the adb cache in BIND 9.2 but does
> > > 	in BIND 9.3 (see the snapshots).
> > >=20
> > > 	datasize should *not* be used to limit the amount of memory
> > > 	used by named.  It purpose is to *raise* the limit if the system
> > > 	default is too small for what you have asked it to do.
> > >=20
> > > 	Mark
> > > --
> > > Mark Andrews, Internet Software Consortium
> > > 1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
> > > PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742                 INTERNET: Mark.Andrews at isc.org
> >=20
> > So i changed like suggested to:
> >=20
> > options {
> >         directory "/var/named/";
> >         allow-query { "corpnets"; };
> >         recursion yes;
> >         allow-recursion {192.168.0.12; 192.168.0.1; 127.0.0.1; };
> >         listen-on {192.168.0.12; 127.0.0.1; };
> >         listen-on-v6 { none; };
> >         minimal-responses yes;
> >         auth-nxdomain no;
> >         notify no;
> >         coresize 5M;
> >         datasize default;
> >         stacksize 5M;
> >         max-cache-size 10M;
> >         heartbeat-interval 0;
> >         interface-interval 0;
> >         lame-ttl 1800;
> >         max-ncache-ttl 86400;
> >         forward only;
> >         forwarders {
> >         194.25.2.131;
> >         145.253.2.11;
> >         };
> > };
> >=20
> > and top says again (still bad more):
> >=20
> > 30419 named     15   0 67744  66M  1944 S     0,0 26,3   0:00 named
> > 30420 named     15   0 67744  66M  1944 S     0,0 26,3   1:57 named
> > 30421 named     15   0 67744  66M  1944 S     0,0 26,3   0:00 named
> > 30422 named     15   0 67744  66M  1944 S     0,0 26,3   0:00 named
> > 30417 named     17   0 67744  66M  1944 S     0,0 26,3   0:00 named
>=20
> 	Did you bother to restart named?  Depending upon the malloc
> 	implementation free'd memory may / may not be released to the
> 	system.  Is named serving zones?  If so they consume memory.
>=20
> 	Did you fetch a snapshot so that the adb cache would also
> 	be controlled?
>=20
> 	Mark
>=20
> >=20
> > --
> > Frank
> >=20
> >=20
> --
> Mark Andrews, Internet Software Consortium
> 1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
> PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742                 INTERNET: Mark.Andrews at isc.org

you right:

zone "blackholes.wirehub.net" {
          type slave;
          file "db.blackholes.wirehub.net.sec";
          masters {
                 194.165.94.1; 195.86.49.227;
                  };
};

zone "dynablock.wirehub.net" {
        type slave;
        file "db.dynablock.wirehub.net.sec";
        masters {
                194.165.94.1; 195.86.49.227;
                };
};

ll /var/named

-rwxr-----    1 named    named         200 Jan 13  2002
0.0.127.in-addr.arpa.zone
-rwxr-----    1 named    named         439 M=E4r  7 18:26
0.168.192.in-addr.arpa
-rw-------    1 named    named     1199386 Aug 21 01:37
db.blackholes.wirehub.net.sec
-rw-------    1 named    named    19409497 Aug 21 01:37
db.dynablock.wirehub.net.sec
-rwxr-----    1 named    named         595 M=E4r  7 18:26 home.zone
-rwxr-----    1 named    named         169 Sep 14  2001 localhost.zone
-rwxr-----    1 named    named         427 Jan 13  2002 named.local

So i tested with and withoute the slave Zone, with Success.

Sorry if i made Confusion or stupid Irritations. I think now it is the
slave Zone.

--
Frank