Memory Reduction

[Frank]

Am Die, 2002-08-20 um 21.49 schrieb Nick Nauwelaerts:
> On 20 Aug 2002 23:41:18 +0000
> Frank <Frank at duranicub.sytes.net> wrote:
> 
> > > That does seem like an awful lot of memory for bind-9.2.1. Let me
> > > show you some of my totals:
> > > 
> > > bind 9.2.1 running openbsd 3.1 for 20 clients: less than 1MB
> > > bind 8.2.4 running sunos 5.7 for 20.000 clients (authorative for
> > > 8000 zones as well): 98MB.
> > > 
> > > How much clients are you serving?
> > 
> > only me ;-)
> > And the Questions seems, WHY ignore named coresize .... etc
> > IS it not possible to run named, caching-only, with lower Memory Usage
> > ? then a authoaritve, with 20 Zones ?
> 
> I think it's mighty strange named is using so much memory. On the linux
> box here named is using 4.6MB of ram for 50 zones (authorative), while
> the same zones on openbsd only use 1.6MB. I'm beginning to suspect linux
> :-)
> What happens when you run named without the memory restrictions?
> 
> // nick

the same, shit happends ...

--
Frank