Dynamic IP & cache DNS

[Brad Knowles]

At 5:00 PM -0400 9/12/01, Kevin Darcy wrote:

>             We could upgrade all of the authoritative nameservers for
>  daimlerchrysler.com to BIND 9 and keep the same bogus data.

	Uh, no.  I don't think you could.  I don't think that BIND 9 
would allow you to continue to keep some of the bogus glue data, if 
nothing else.

>                                                               Surely
>  you would agree that BIND 9 is more sophisticated than BIND 8,
>  wouldn't you? I think this is then a valid counterargument.

	Yes, I would agree that BIND 9 is more sophisticated than BIND 8, 
but I have to believe that the stuff I found is just the tip of the 
iceberg, and in that case I also have to believe that there would be 
enough internal problems that would prevent you from being able to 
make successful use of such an advanced feature, without first 
cleaning up the sort of stuff I found.

-- 
Brad Knowles, <brad.knowles at skynet.be>

H4sICIFgXzsCA2RtYS1zaWcAPVHLbsMwDDvXX0H0kkvbfxiwVw8FCmzAzqqj1F4dy7CdBfn7
Kc6wmyGRFEnvvxiWQoCvqI7RSWTcfGXQNqCUAnfIU+AT8OZ/GCNjRVlH0bKpguJkxiITZqes
MxwpSucyDJzXxQEUe/ihgXqJXUXwD9ajB6NHonLmNrUSK9nacHQnH097szO74xFXqtlbT3il
wMsBz5cnfCR5cEmci0Rj9u/jqBbPeES1I4PeFBXPUIT1XDSOuutFXylzrQvGyboWstCoQZyP
dxX4dLx0eauFe1x9puhoi0Ao1omEJo+BZ6XLVNaVpWiKekxN0VK2VMpmAy+Bk7ZV4SO+p1L/
uErNRS/qH2iFU+iNOtbcmVt9N16lfF7tLv9FXNj8AiyNcOi1AQAA