Bind 9.1.3 stop resolving but is still running.

[Brad Knowles]

At 1:49 AM -0400 9/6/01, Jason Larke wrote:

>  9.2.0 has features we want, so I'll probably just wait on it
>  until 9.2.0 goes final, and keep an eye on releases thereafter. I
>  only tried it with threading on, and the machine had plenty of
>  RAM.

	In which case, only detailed profiling with the vendor compiler 
is likely to be able to tell you what is going on and why.

>  Will do- thanks for the tip.

	Please keep in mind that I completely disagree with his choice of 
djbdns for use on his nameservers, but he does at least have a pretty 
good start at a testing methodology for looking at caching 
performance.

>  It was Solaris 8 on a Sun Netra 1125, as it happens.

	Using gcc, or the vendor provided compilers?

-- 
Brad Knowles, <brad.knowles at skynet.be>

H4sICIFgXzsCA2RtYS1zaWcAPVHLbsMwDDvXX0H0kkvbfxiwVw8FCmzAzqqj1F4dy7CdBfn7
Kc6wmyGRFEnvvxiWQoCvqI7RSWTcfGXQNqCUAnfIU+AT8OZ/GCNjRVlH0bKpguJkxiITZqes
MxwpSucyDJzXxQEUe/ihgXqJXUXwD9ajB6NHonLmNrUSK9nacHQnH097szO74xFXqtlbT3il
wMsBz5cnfCR5cEmci0Rj9u/jqBbPeES1I4PeFBXPUIT1XDSOuutFXylzrQvGyboWstCoQZyP
dxX4dLx0eauFe1x9puhoi0Ao1omEJo+BZ6XLVNaVpWiKekxN0VK2VMpmAy+Bk7ZV4SO+p1L/
uErNRS/qH2iFU+iNOtbcmVt9N16lfF7tLv9FXNj8AiyNcOi1AQAA