Hidden Master

[Chimento, Douglas]

Thanks guys 
What if you put the  SLAVE in the SOA MNAME would this cause any issues?

-----Original Message-----
From: Barry Margolin [mailto:barmar at genuity.net]
Sent: Wednesday, November 07, 2001 10:54 AM
To: comp-protocols-dns-bind at moderators.isc.org
Subject: Re: Hidden Master


In article <9sahlr$4po at pub3.rc.vix.com>,
Chimento, Douglas <Douglas.Chimento at FMR.COM> wrote:
>so in the end putting a unresolvable SOA MNAME record would be fine?

I thought we all made it clear, but I guess it can't hurt to repeat it:
Yes, you can put anything you want in the MNAME field.

Actually, I just remembered one exception: there are some country TLD
registrars that check the SOA record and reject the registration if MNAME
doesn't match one of the NS records (I don't know a complete list offhand,
but .FR may be one of them).  We use a hidden master for all our domains,
and normally put it in the MNAME field, but we've had to special-case a
couple dozen domains that we host by putting one of the slave servers in
the MNAME so that the registration would go through.

But unless you run into a registrar that complains, don't worry about this.

-- 
Barry Margolin, barmar at genuity.net
Genuity, Woburn, MA
*** DON'T SEND TECHNICAL QUESTIONS DIRECTLY TO ME, post them to newsgroups.
Please DON'T copy followups to me -- I'll assume it wasn't posted to the
group.