You don't notice anything massively bogus with the second zone
definition below???
- Kevin
Support wrote:
> this is around line 638
>
> zone "woodhallassociates.co.uk" {
> type slave;
> file "S/woodhallassociates.co.uk";
> masters {
> 212.15.64.59;
> };
> };
>
> zone "" {
> type slave;
> file "S/";
> masters {
> ;
> };
> };
>
> thanks
>
> Andy Saunders