2.4 kernel and bind 8.2.3 - REL.

[Brad Knowles]

At 6:07 PM -0700 6/24/01, paul j wrote:

>  Total of 5,000 primary domains, and one server backing all 5,000 domains up..

	Again, no problem.

>  Total of 3 name servers, that I was hopping to speed-up with the 
>new kernel...
>  I am still reading on bind 9.x.x.... whay will they not leave the format
>  ALONE!!!?....

	The format has been left alone.  Well-formed named.conf files and 
zone files from BIND 8 should work unchanged under BIND 9.  The key 
word is "well-formed", because BIND 8 has been more lax about 
requiring adherence to certain aspects of the syntax of the files, 
whereas BIND 9 is much more strict.

>  Pain in my ass to have to rebuild all my domains, every time we upgrade
>  our bind version.... so much work I don't like doing it very much..
>
>  If they are going to add features, why must they make such RADICAL
>  changes...Ooh, that's right no one can agree on a standard in *nix,
>  and if someone try's they get shoot down with "You are taking away
>  our freedom to code how we want"....
>
>  Can't we all just get ALONG??

	Just what on *EARTH* are you talking about?  Have you been taking 
drugs or something?!?

-- 
Brad Knowles, <brad.knowles at skynet.be>

/*        efdtt.c  Author:  Charles M. Hannum <root at ihack.net>          */
/*       Represented as 1045 digit prime number by Phil Carmody         */
/*     Prime as DNS cname chain by Roy Arends and Walter Belgers        */
/*                                                                      */
/*     Usage is:  cat title-key scrambled.vob | efdtt >clear.vob        */
/*   where title-key = "153 2 8 105 225" or other similar 5-byte key    */

dig decss.friet.org|perl -ne'if(/^x/){s/[x.]//g;print pack(H124,$_)}'