2.4 kernel and bind 8.2.3 - REL.

[paul j]

For the time.....
But it getting harder for me to get approval to upgrade our bind, because 
of the problems and phone calls it causes..

I don't think we will support the new I.P. Ver. 6 128-BIT for quite some 
time....



At 03:27 PM 6/24/2001, Willis L. Sarka wrote:

>On Sun, 24 Jun 2001, paul j wrote:
>
> >
> > At 12:49 AM 6/24/2001, Willis L. Sarka wrote:
> > >Well Paul,
> > >
> > >I'm running Bind 9.1.0 on RedHat 7.1 with the "NEW" kernel, and seems to
> > >be working fine.  The general rule of thumb for most OSes I've ever worked
> > >with is to have swap twice the size of memory.  I'm curious, what do you
> > >mean that 8.2.3 did not like it at first?  Not having enough swap?
> >
> >
> > >How big of a zone are you running?
> >
> > Lets see..... I have over 3,500 names in one of my name servers.
>
>Fair enough...
>
> > >   How heavily used is this name server?
> >
> > Very heavily...
>
>Ok.
>
>
>Guess YMMV, hope you have everything running smooth now :^).
>
> >
> >
> >
> > >Cheers,
> > >Will Sarka
> > >
> > >On Sat, 23 Jun 2001, Paul Jacobs wrote:
> > >
> > > >
> > > > Anyone else finding that the "NEW" linux kernel 2.4 is not all it 
> is said
> > > > to be...?
> > > > It seems to be more microsoft like... (needs double swap file now?)
> > > > 8.2.3 did not like it at first, but calmed down. -:)
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Best regards,
> > > > Paul Jacobs /Senior Network Eng.
> > > > Netpacq Systems Inc.
> > > > http://www.netpacq.com
> > > > mailto:paul at netpacq.com
> > > > Picture : http://netpacq.com/nis_about.htm
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> >
> > Best regards,
> > Paul Jacobs /Senior Network Eng.
> > Netpacq Systems Inc.
> > http://www.netpacq.com
> > mailto:paul at netpacq.com
> > Picture : http://netpacq.com/nis_about.htm
> >
> >
> >
> >

Best regards,
Paul Jacobs /Senior Network Eng.
Netpacq Systems Inc.
http://www.netpacq.com
mailto:paul at netpacq.com
Picture : http://netpacq.com/nis_about.htm