named error messages in log file, how to fix?
Mark.Andrews at nominum.com
Mark.Andrews at nominum.com
Mon Jun 25 00:13:46 UTC 2001
> >
> > > Jun 24 15:46:22 luna named[605]: client 192.168.1.61#137:
> > > error sending response: host unreachable
> >
> > You machine does not have a route to 192.168.1.61.
>
> Your guess sounds logical, but not observed as the fact.
Well then ipchains, or similar, is blocking packets to
port 137 on 192.168.1.61.
>
> The fact is, I can get ping reply from
> Linux(192.168.1.254 running bind) to Win98(192.168.1.61).
>
> >From Linux box:
> #ping 192.168.1.61
> PING 192.168.1.61 (192.168.1.61) from 192.168.1.254 : 56(84) bytes of data.
> 64 bytes from 192.168.1.61: icmp_seq=0 ttl=128 time=28.988 msec
> 64 bytes from 192.168.1.61: icmp_seq=1 ttl=128 time=16.751 msec
> 64 bytes from 192.168.1.61: icmp_seq=2 ttl=128 time=6.784 msec
>
> Ping from Linux to Win98, result seems always been consistant.
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> And vise versa, from Win98 box:
>
> C:\WINDOWS\Desktop>ping 192.168.1.254
> Pinging 192.168.1.254 with 32 bytes of data:
> Reply from 192.168.1.254: bytes=32 time=2ms TTL=255
> Reply from 192.168.1.254: bytes=32 time=2ms TTL=255
> Reply from 192.168.1.254: bytes=32 time=2ms TTL=255
> Reply from 192.168.1.254: bytes=32 time=2ms TTL=255
>
> Ping statistics for 192.168.1.254:
> Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
> Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
> Minimum = 2ms, Maximum = 2ms, Average = 2ms
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> But I noticed result may not 100% consistant ping
> from Win98 to Linux box, accasionaly, especially after
> some period of inactivity, it seems I got some packet
> loss when pinging from Win98 to RH7.1. That's could
> be the reason errors in the log.
> Pinging 192.168.1.254 with 32 bytes of data:
>
> Reply from 192.168.1.254: bytes=32 time=5ms TTL=255
> Reply from 192.168.1.254: Destination port unreachable.
> Reply from 192.168.1.254: Destination port unreachable.
> Reply from 192.168.1.254: Destination port unreachable.
>
> Ping statistics for 192.168.1.254:
> Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
> Minimum = 5ms, Maximum = 5ms, Average = 1ms
>
> Isn't that strange? 3 out of 4 packets were unreachable as above,
> but Win98 still reports 0% loss?
> What could cause such 'unreachable'? I have two Cisco switch
> and one Farolon hub, switch/hub configuration problem?
> sorry for posting wrong place if this turns out not a dns issue.
> thanks.
--
Mark Andrews, Nominum Inc.
1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: Mark.Andrews at nominum.com
More information about the bind-users
mailing list