Trying to setup a new primary BIND DNS

[Dan Du Vall]

Well I would but the only thing i notice is most of the sites that show how
to se things up say that i should get a nslooup form 127.0.0.1 andit should
say localhost and the 127.0.0.1 ip address I get nothing even with the basic
setup that the linux install created for bin. It is working as a cache
server though.
"Klinkefus, David S" <DSKlinkefus at midamerican.com> wrote in message
news:9id911$jme at pub3.rc.vix.com...
> I agree with Barry, but with a few nslookup's, from here
> it looks like there is no reverse entry (PTR record) for
> ns.quadtrax.net.
>
> This is just an initial query. With the information Barry
> mentions in his posting, it makes it much mucn easier! ;-)
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Barry Margolin [mailto:barmar at genuity.net]
> Sent: Monday, July 09, 2001 4:09 PM
> To: comp-protocols-dns-bind at moderators.isc.org
> Subject: Re: Trying to setup a new primary BIND DNS
>
>
> In article <9icp4m$h56 at pub3.rc.vix.com>,
> Dan Du Vall <sysop at quadtrax.com> wrote:
> >Hello,
> >        I am trying to setup a new bind dns server and am lost and this
> >point I am running REDHAT 7 and its got all the updates from red hat
> >current. Any way I need to setup quadtrax.net with everything from mail
to
> >ftp stuff I have created some files but can get any thing to work I am
not
> >even sure I have the files right. If any one out there can help I would
> have
> >no problem being a secondary for anyone who needs it. I could use a
> >secondary dns also I have tried the (PUBLIC DNS SERVICE) but as before I
am
> >lost in the file structure.
> >
> >I have registered with networksolutions (ns.quadtrax.net)
> >
> >IF any one can help it would be greatly appreciated.
>
> If you don't show us what you've done and what the errors are, I don't see
> how you expect anyone to provide guidance.
>
> --
> Barry Margolin, barmar at genuity.net
> Genuity, Burlington, MA
> *** DON'T SEND TECHNICAL QUESTIONS DIRECTLY TO ME, post them to
newsgroups.
> Please DON'T copy followups to me -- I'll assume it wasn't posted to the
> group.
>
>
>
>