Big Help needed with MX (again)
Gary Kline
kline at ns1.thought.org
Fri Jul 6 04:25:50 UTC 2001
On Fri, Jul 06, 2001 at 01:32:43PM +1000, Mark.Andrews at nominum.com wrote:
>
> > Any suggestions on what's wrong with the first use? Or shouldn't
> > I be pointing named-checkzone at named-conf?!
>
> You shouldn't be pointing named-checkzone at named.conf.
>
> "named-checkzone thought.org" is short hand for
> "named-checkzone thought.org thought.org" and given too
> many people can't seem to get this, it has gone away in
> BIND 9.2.x. Too many people were doing
> "named-checkzone s/db.thought.org" then complaining.
>
I admit to having tried several incantations before realizing
what the utility was looking for. (Poking into the code was
next... .)
One thing to bear in mind with many readers is that they may
be entireely new to BIND. With only a few weeks or months of
use rather than many years. ...Ah, what a life!
gary
--
Gary D. Kline kline at thought.org www.thought.org Public service Unix
More information about the bind-users
mailing list