load balacing

[Marc C Storck]

DON'T EXPECT ANY ANSWERS TO YOUR POST AS YOU USE A STUPID ANTI-SPAM
ADDRESS!!!! AS MY MAILBOX IS FLOODED WITH USER or HOST UNKNOWN ERROR
MESSAGES I WOULD LIKE TO HAVE A VOTE ON BANNING SUCH POSTERS FROM THE LIST!
I CONSIDER THIS FLOODS OF ERROR MESSAGE __SPAM__ !!!

Marc

----- Original Message -----
From: e-o-f <airmaxNOSPAM at flashnet.it>
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.dns.bind
To: <comp-protocols-dns-bind at moderators.isc.org>
Sent: Monday, July 02, 2001 9:54 PM
Subject: Re: load balacing


> Ok man..
> thanx very much..
> but I permit to think that in this situation (master and slave) the
> customers that use this two dnsses decide who use as first and second..
> so, the second one will use only if the first one is down (I presume...)
>
> I can't explain but what I want is two similar dnsses behind a switch with
> only 1 ip address...
> then random use the first or the second...
> then, in another VLAN I can configure a slave server...
> Sorry for my bad explain.
> Thanx again.
> _
> D.
>
>