Reverse Lookup Bind 9

Barry Margolin barmar at genuity.net
Wed Jan 10 21:47:54 UTC 2001


In article <93ii6j$dt3 at pub3.rc.vix.com>,
Ruben I Safir - Brooklyn Linux Solutions CEO  <ruben at mrbrklyn.com> wrote:
>
>
>> 
>> Maybe you should use the -d option to nslookup to see what's happening when
>> it tries to do the initial reverse lookup.
>
>
>Thanks 
>
>> 
>> But since nslookup skipped over this server, it won't see what it has.
>
>Right
>
>that's the core issue.  What am I doing wrong that the is not capabile
>of resolving itself.

I don't know.  That was the point of suggesting -d.  You said that when you
used dig it was able to resolve its own address, so -d should show what
specific query nslookup is sending, and maybe this will shed light on the
difference.

-- 
Barry Margolin, barmar at genuity.net
Genuity, Burlington, MA
*** DON'T SEND TECHNICAL QUESTIONS DIRECTLY TO ME, post them to newsgroups.
Please DON'T copy followups to me -- I'll assume it wasn't posted to the group.



More information about the bind-users mailing list