Reverse Lookup Bind 9
Barry Margolin
barmar at genuity.net
Wed Jan 10 21:47:54 UTC 2001
In article <93ii6j$dt3 at pub3.rc.vix.com>,
Ruben I Safir - Brooklyn Linux Solutions CEO <ruben at mrbrklyn.com> wrote:
>
>
>>
>> Maybe you should use the -d option to nslookup to see what's happening when
>> it tries to do the initial reverse lookup.
>
>
>Thanks
>
>>
>> But since nslookup skipped over this server, it won't see what it has.
>
>Right
>
>that's the core issue. What am I doing wrong that the is not capabile
>of resolving itself.
I don't know. That was the point of suggesting -d. You said that when you
used dig it was able to resolve its own address, so -d should show what
specific query nslookup is sending, and maybe this will shed light on the
difference.
--
Barry Margolin, barmar at genuity.net
Genuity, Burlington, MA
*** DON'T SEND TECHNICAL QUESTIONS DIRECTLY TO ME, post them to newsgroups.
Please DON'T copy followups to me -- I'll assume it wasn't posted to the group.
More information about the bind-users
mailing list