use www and not

Barry Margolin barmar at genuity.net
Fri Jan 5 21:49:32 UTC 2001


In article <93596e$172 at pub3.rc.vix.com>,  <bhorstkotte at my-deja.com> wrote:
>
>> No, it doesn't look right.  A name can't have both CNAME and other
>> records.  Since communityvista.com has to have SOA and NS records,
>> it can't also have a CNAME record.  If you want this to work,
>> you'll have to use an A record with the same address as
>> cv.dtdns.net.  If dtdns.net is a dynamic DNS service, you can't
>> do what you want just with DNS.
>
>Thanks for the response - but I did it this way yesterday, and it's
>working fine (although it could be "breaking the rules") :D

Was your secondary nameserver able to transfer the zone?  I suspect not.

And even if it could, this type of thing can result in transient failures
due to the way caching servers work.

-- 
Barry Margolin, barmar at genuity.net
Genuity, Burlington, MA
*** DON'T SEND TECHNICAL QUESTIONS DIRECTLY TO ME, post them to newsgroups.
Please DON'T copy followups to me -- I'll assume it wasn't posted to the group.



More information about the bind-users mailing list