FW: version question

[Timothy.Moseley at hurlburt.af.mil]

James just wanted to thank you and the rest for all of the responses, what I
finally ended up doing was taking the dig command that Joseph Yao gave and
running it on the server.

dig txt chaos version.bind @dolphin.mydomainname

it showed the version running as being 8.2.3 even tho named -v still shows
8.2.2-p7. Since I can show actual version with dig command its no longer a
huge priority. I will continue to work with the server to see if I can't get
the other to work properly. To any that asked about the version being in the
options part of my named.conf it wasn't listed there.

Thanks for all the help.

Tim

> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: James A Griffin [mailto:agriffin at cpcug.org]
> >Sent: Friday, February 16, 2001 3:52 PM
> >To: Timothy.Moseley at hurlburt.af.mil
> >Subject: Re: FW: version question
> >
> >
> >Timothy.Moseley at hurlburt.af.mil wrote:
> >> 
> >> either way gives same response and which comes back with
> >> /usr/local/sbin/named
> >> 
> >> > >-----Original Message-----
> >> > >From: Claude Marinier [mailto:claude.marinier at dreo.dnd.ca]
> >> > >Sent: Friday, February 16, 2001 2:41 PM
> >> > >To: Timothy.Moseley at hurlburt.af.mil
> >> > >Subject: Re: FW: version question
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > >Did you
> >> > >     /usr/local/sbin/named -v
> >> > >or
> >> > >     named -v
> >> > >?
> >> > >
> >[snip]
> >
> >Tim,
> >
> >This is really odd.  I've just caught up with the list.  Can you copy
> >the binary from an working machine to a temp location on the problem
> >machine. Kill the running named process and start the copy.
> >
> >Regards,
> >Jim
> >