DNS zone below syntactically and semantically correct??

[Michael Kjorling]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

As has been pointed out already, you do need NS records. Other than
that, ``named-admin.renard.fh-worms.de.'' is not a valid RRtype. The
TTLs seem a bit strange to me but that is not a problem as far as BIND
is concerned.

And of course, did you try named-checkzone?


Michael Kjörling


On Dec 9 2001 21:13 +0100, Manuel Weber wrote:

> Is the DNS zone below syntactically and semantically correct?
> If no, which entry is wrong?
>
> Fh-Worms.DE.     IN      SOA renard.Fh-Worms.DE.
>                                 named-admin.renard.Fh-Worms.DE.
>                                 ( 2000052901
>                                   7200
>                                   900
>                                   3600000
>                                   87400
>                                 )
> villon                 IN     A 143.93.160.3
> gopher     41200 IN    CNAME villon.Fh-Worms.DE.
> renard     90345 IN     A 143.93.160.6

- -- 
Michael Kjörling  --  Programmer/Network administrator  ^..^
PGP: 95f1 074d 336d f8f0 f297 6a5b 2aa3 7bfd 8a70 e33e   \/
Internet: michael at kjorling.com -- FidoNet: 2:204/254.4

"There is something to be said about not trying to be glamorous
and popular and cool. Just be real -- and life will be real."
(Joyce Sequichie Hifler, September 13 2001, www.hifler.com)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Public key is at http://michael.kjorling.com/contact/pgp.html

iD8DBQE8FHkJKqN7/Ypw4z4RAm//AJ4nLsOtitxZ6SaENxTEtYTboOBibwCfSdmT
Mnkc/nZktHGpHU7gynfmzY8=
=vP1T
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----