Allow Multiple-Cnames in BIND 9
Michael Kjorling
michael at kjorling.com
Sun Dec 2 22:56:11 UTC 2001
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
My question is - how well does this work with DNSSEC?
Michael Kjörling
On Dec 2 2001 22:49 -0000, Marc Thach Xuan Ky wrote:
> Doug,
> The working model is of course Cisco Distributed Director. In its later
> incarnations it allows a specifed number of A records to be returned in a
> response. Whether or not this idea is attractive depends on a) money b)
> learning to live with the rest of DDs little habits.
> rgds
> Marc TXK
- --
Michael Kjörling -- Programmer/Network administrator ^..^
PGP: 95f1 074d 336d f8f0 f297 6a5b 2aa3 7bfd 8a70 e33e \/
Internet: michael at kjorling.com -- FidoNet: 2:204/254.4
"There is something to be said about not trying to be glamorous
and popular and cool. Just be real -- and life will be real."
(Joyce Sequichie Hifler, September 13 2001, www.hifler.com)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Public key is at http://michael.kjorling.com/contact/pgp.html
iD8DBQE8CrGQKqN7/Ypw4z4RAqmMAJ0QfPcMD6FWBdrQQlkKf1NRlpvLTACeJAFw
FMocg9h4BAItgph2ndi+AAU=
=Xgdn
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the bind-users
mailing list