refresh_callback: zone , after bind9 upgrade

Barry Margolin barmar at genuity.net
Wed Aug 8 22:28:51 UTC 2001


In article <9ksdgl$nci at pub3.rc.vix.com>,  <Mark.Andrews at nominum.com> wrote:
>	The re-write had to do more with code managability and
>	correctness of operation, new protocol features, IPv6
>	support.  Clearer error messages was further down the list.
>	I think we have actually achieved the primary goals of the
>	BIND 9 re-write.

But you were rewording the error messages anyway.  It shouldn't take any
more effort to make them understandable in the process.  On the contrary,
it seems to me like you took pains to make them even more inscrutable than
BIND 8's.

-- 
Barry Margolin, barmar at genuity.net
Genuity, Woburn, MA
*** DON'T SEND TECHNICAL QUESTIONS DIRECTLY TO ME, post them to newsgroups.
Please DON'T copy followups to me -- I'll assume it wasn't posted to the group.


More information about the bind-users mailing list