Unapproved updates

Kevin Darcy kcd at daimlerchrysler.com
Fri Sep 15 22:32:29 UTC 2000


"Unapproved" is misleading; it should really say "denied".

What causes it? Win2K stupidity, in most cases, especially if you see
attempted updates from the same source regularly at 5/10/60 minute
intervals, which you are.


- Kevin

Ali Eghtessadi wrote:

> What does the following messages in the syslog mean and what causes it?
>
> Thanks for your help.
> Ali
>
> Sep 14 06:28:09 alcatraz named[108]: unapproved update from
> [64.20.39.112].1084 for babcockbrown.com
> Sep 14 06:33:16 alcatraz named[108]: unapproved update from
> [64.20.39.112].1172 for babcockbrown.com
> Sep 14 06:43:22 alcatraz named[108]: unapproved update from
> [64.20.39.112].1331 for babcockbrown.com
> Sep 14 07:59:31 alcatraz named[108]: unapproved update from
> [64.20.39.18].1096 for babcockbrown.com
> Sep 14 18:44:15 alcatraz named[108]: unapproved update from
> [64.20.37.214].1083 for babcockbrown.com
> Sep 14 18:49:20 alcatraz named[108]: unapproved update from
> [64.20.37.214].1146 for babcockbrown.com
> Sep 14 18:59:24 alcatraz named[108]: unapproved update from
> [64.20.37.214].1287 for babcockbrown.com
> Sep 14 20:42:27 alcatraz named[108]: unapproved update from
> [216.67.102.147].1087 for babcockbrown.com
> Sep 15 06:26:26 alcatraz named[108]: unapproved update from
> [64.20.39.109].1044 for babcockbrown.com
> Sep 15 06:31:36 alcatraz named[108]: unapproved update from
> [64.20.39.109].1162 for babcockbrown.com
> Sep 15 06:41:40 alcatraz named[108]: unapproved update from
> [64.20.39.109].1270 for babcockbrown.com
> Sep 15 11:12:21 alcatraz named[108]: unapproved update from
> [64.20.39.224].1098 for babcockbrown.com






More information about the bind-users mailing list