Re-writing RFC1918 addresses? [Was: Re: Looking for way to mark a zone no-xfer for a sub-domain .]

[Bill Manning]

% 
% On Sat, Sep 09, 2000 at 03:54:01AM -0700, Bill Manning wrote:
% > 	The kicker is that RFC 1918 addresses in email headers
% > 	are -NOT- filtered by NATs/Firewalls and so escape into
% > 	the Internet. They ought to be re-written at the ALG.
% 
% ISTM that that is a debatable opinion.  I'm not clear on why you
% believe this - I can imagine, but I would rather have you specify which
% header lines you are talking about, what problems this would cause, and
% what justification there is for overwriting valid tracking information
% or addressing lines.
% 
% -- 
% Joe Yao				jsdy at cospo.osis.gov - Joseph S. D. Yao

I really don't like getting this type of mail.
Check the second received line.  

..... 
This spam seemingly came through or orignated on your network.  I object in the
strongest of terms to receiving this type of email and have reported this incident
to the Federal Trade Commission.  Please see that I do not receive anymore.
 
Regards,
 
Jeff
 
Received: from atipa.com ([64.64.30.2])
        by procyon.blazenet.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id GAA18910
        for <jhorn at blazenet.net>; Tue, 12 Sep 2000 06:12:35 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from thgzg.msn.com (firewall.atipa [192.168.1.1]))
        by atipa.com  with SMTP id e8C5FD327645;
        Tue, 12 Sep 2000 00:15:13 -0500                                         
.......

-- 
--bill