Is e.root-servers.net lame for com?
Jeff Robinson
jeff at learnix.ca
Fri Mar 10 00:46:03 UTC 2000
Cricket,
It sure looks as though e.root-servers.net. is lame for com..
Interesting...
Jeff Robinson
Cricket Liu wrote:
> Or am I just misinterpreting this dig output?
>
> $ dig @e.root-servers.net. soa com. +norec
>
> ; <<>> DiG 8.2 <<>> @e.root-servers.net. soa com. +norec
> ; (1 server found)
> ;; res options: init defnam dnsrch
> ;; got answer:
> ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 32309
> ;; flags: qr; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 0, AUTHORITY: 12, ADDITIONAL: 12
> ;; QUERY SECTION:
> ;; com, type = SOA, class = IN
>
> ;; AUTHORITY SECTION:
> com. 6D IN NS A.ROOT-SERVERS.NET.
> com. 6D IN NS H.ROOT-SERVERS.NET.
> com. 6D IN NS C.ROOT-SERVERS.NET.
> com. 6D IN NS G.ROOT-SERVERS.NET.
> com. 6D IN NS F.GTLD-SERVERS.NET.
> com. 6D IN NS F.ROOT-SERVERS.NET.
> com. 6D IN NS B.ROOT-SERVERS.NET.
> com. 6D IN NS I.ROOT-SERVERS.NET.
> com. 6D IN NS E.ROOT-SERVERS.NET.
> com. 6D IN NS D.ROOT-SERVERS.NET.
> com. 6D IN NS J.GTLD-SERVERS.NET.
> com. 6D IN NS K.GTLD-SERVERS.NET.
>
> ;; ADDITIONAL SECTION:
> A.ROOT-SERVERS.NET. 5w6d16h IN A 198.41.0.4
> H.ROOT-SERVERS.NET. 5w6d16h IN A 128.63.2.53
> C.ROOT-SERVERS.NET. 5w6d16h IN A 192.33.4.12
> G.ROOT-SERVERS.NET. 5w6d16h IN A 192.112.36.4
> F.GTLD-SERVERS.NET. 6D IN A 198.17.208.67
> F.ROOT-SERVERS.NET. 5w6d16h IN A 192.5.5.241
> B.ROOT-SERVERS.NET. 5w6d16h IN A 128.9.0.107
> I.ROOT-SERVERS.NET. 5w6d16h IN A 192.36.148.17
> E.ROOT-SERVERS.NET. 5w6d16h IN A 192.203.230.10
> D.ROOT-SERVERS.NET. 5w6d16h IN A 128.8.10.90
> J.GTLD-SERVERS.NET. 6D IN A 198.41.0.21
> K.GTLD-SERVERS.NET. 6D IN A 195.8.99.11
>
> cricket
>
> Acme Byte & Wire
> cricket at acmebw.com
> www.acmebw.com
>
> Attend the next Internet Software Consortium/Acme Byte & Wire
> DNS and BIND class! See www.acmebw.com/training.htm for
> the schedule and to register for upcoming classes.
More information about the bind-users
mailing list