Free secundary NameServer

Barry Margolin barmar at bbnplanet.com
Mon Mar 27 21:56:40 UTC 2000


In article <8bocac$76f$1 at weber.a2000.nl>, Roeland <j.a.graat at chello.nl> wrote:
>Hi,
>I just registered a domain and like to run a nameserver myself an let the
>secondary hosted by others.
>
>I have two questions?
>
>1. Where can I get an free secondary Name Server (besides Granitecanyon,
>cause the often down)

Why does it have to be free?  Doesn't the GraniteCanyon situation prove the
adage that you get what you pay for?

>2. Does the zone files of the primary and secondary have to be the same,

The secondary automatically copies the zone from the primary.

>because the seconday nameserver is only contacted if the primary is down?
>Am I right on that?

No.  No one else on the Internet can tell which is primary and which is
secondary.  They just get a list of nameservers and query whichever one
seems best.  The main criterion is the one with the best response time
history.  If your secondary server has a faster Internet connection than
you, they may get most of the queries.

-- 
Barry Margolin, barmar at bbnplanet.com
GTE Internetworking, Powered by BBN, Burlington, MA
*** DON'T SEND TECHNICAL QUESTIONS DIRECTLY TO ME, post them to newsgroups.
Please DON'T copy followups to me -- I'll assume it wasn't posted to the group.



More information about the bind-users mailing list