Our ISP's name server went down and brought our DNS down

Brent Bolin brent at dbprograms.com
Sun Jun 18 14:55:59 UTC 2000


Kevin Darcy wrote:

> Brent Bolin wrote:
>
> > A couple of days ago our ISP's name servers went down.
> >
> > This brought our DNS for addresses in the world down also.  Local names
> > worked fine.
>
> > Here is the dig info -
> >
> > ;; got answer:
> > ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 4
> > ;; flags: qr aa rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 1, AUTHORITY: 3, ADDITIONAL: 3
> > ;; QUERY SECTION:
> > ;;      www.dspi.com, type = A, class = IN
> >
> > ;; ANSWER SECTION:
> > www.dspi.com.           4H IN A         216.233.10.162
> >
> > ;; AUTHORITY SECTION:
> > dspi.com.               4H IN NS        auth1.ns.eni.net.
> > dspi.com.               4H IN NS        auth2.ns.eni.net.
> > dspi.com.               4H IN NS        auth3.ns.eni.net.
> >
> > ;; ADDITIONAL SECTION:
> > auth1.ns.eni.net.       4H IN A         205.214.45.6
> > auth2.ns.eni.net.       4H IN A         155.229.2.181
> > auth3.ns.eni.net.       4H IN A         155.229.126.67
> >
> > ;; Total query time: 58 msec
> > ;; FROM: pheonix.dbprograms.com to SERVER: default -- 216.233.79.154
> > ;; WHEN: Thu Jun 15 09:43:41 2000
> > ;; MSG SIZE  sent: 30  rcvd: 172
> >
> > What is the order that our DNS looks for addresses?.  Dosen't it look
> > for the name server that is authorative for that domain?
>
> Yes, it'll try to query servers that are listed (with NS records) as
> serving the zone. Whether those servers are "authoritative" or not, of
> course, depends on whether they are configured correctly or not. If a
> server is listed for the zone, but is not authoritative, then we refer to
> it as a "lame server".
>
> > When we do a query does it get the answer from the servers listed by
> > whois?
>
> The WHOIS-listed nameservers match the delegations from "com", "net",
> "org" or whatever. But this delegation information is not the final word
> on what servers serve the zone -- the NS records from the delegated
> servers themselves is considered more "credible" than the delegations from
> the parent, and that's what BIND will use if it has a choice.
>
> > Our ISP's DNS servers are not configured in named.boot files.  DNS is
> > primed only from root servers.
> >
> > Does anybody know why this happed?
>
> Doesn't make any sense to me, unless they have some nifty router software
> that redirects DNS packets to their caching servers and then spoofs the
> responses to look like they come from Internet servers (presumably to
> decrease query latency and conserve a tiny amount of their Internet
> bandwidth).
>
> Why don't you ask them?
>
> - Kevin

I will ask the ISP if they have some nifty router software.

Let me ask this, if my primary name server can't reach the other listed name
servers where does it go for the answer?.




More information about the bind-users mailing list