named.boot vs. named.conf ???

Barry Margolin barmar at bbnplanet.com
Fri Jan 28 15:03:45 UTC 2000


In article <002101bf6937$be6d11c0$6401a8c0 at laptop.coxnetwork.net>,
Duane Cox <dcox at coxnetwork.com> wrote:
>could someone please explain to me the difference between named.boot and
>named.conf
>it seems as though these files could server the same purpose.. but why two?
>is it save to delete named.boot if you are using named.conf?

BIND 4 uses named.boot, BIND 8 uses named.conf.  They changed the name of
the file because the syntax changed radically.

-- 
Barry Margolin, barmar at bbnplanet.com
GTE Internetworking, Powered by BBN, Burlington, MA
*** DON'T SEND TECHNICAL QUESTIONS DIRECTLY TO ME, post them to newsgroups.
Please DON'T copy followups to me -- I'll assume it wasn't posted to the group.



More information about the bind-users mailing list