Speed of BIND vs. W2k DNS

Barry Finkel b19141 at achilles.ctd.anl.gov
Tue Dec 26 02:05:22 UTC 2000


"alevey" <alevey at home.com> wrote:

> You missed a HUGE aspect of W2K DNS... multi-master. No single point of
> failure, unlike BIND.

As has been posted previously, with a MS Active Directory-integrated DNS,
there are times when the zones on each of the Domain Controllers has different
serial numbers.  I have also noticed this in our W2k testbed (until we decided
that we did not need AD-integrated zones).  We had one case where a zone on a
single AD-integrated zone (i.e., only one DC) became corrupted (lower serial
number) after the DC had a non-clean shutdown and reboot (e.g., after a power
failure).  I do not consider this a case of "No single point of failure".
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Barry S. Finkel
Electronics and Computing Technologies Division
Argonne National Laboratory          Phone:    +1 (630) 252-7277
9700 South Cass Avenue               Facsimile:+1 (630) 252-9689
Building 221, Room B236              Internet: BSFinkel at anl.gov
Argonne, IL   60439-4844             IBMMAIL:  I1004994



More information about the bind-users mailing list