RFC naming question

[Joseph S D Yao]

On Wed, Mar 01, 2000 at 02:15:00PM -0600, Henri J. Schlereth wrote:
> While I understand that there is a set of non-publishable reserved
> IP addresses (I use them) but is there an equvalent naming convention
> such as .lan .wan or whatever? If so is there info on this.
> 
> TIA
> Henri

Answer to a previous question:
> Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2000 11:18:40 -0500
> From: Joseph S D Yao <jsdy at cospo.osis.gov>
> To: John Devitofranceschi <jdevitofrances at home.net>
> Cc: comp-protocols-dns-bind at moderators.isc.org
> Subject: Re: Private DNS Domains
> 
> On Sat, Jan 08, 2000 at 11:01:30PM +0000, John Devitofranceschi wrote:
> > A colleague of mine and I were talking about our internal/external
> > (split) DNS setup.  We came around to discussing the possibility 
> > of 'formally recognized' (by RFC) private domains, like the private
> > networks defined by RFC 1918. 
> > 
> > Has this idea been discussed?  It seems like a neat way to avoid
> > needing to implement an internal 'fake root' zone.  You could simply
> > have DOMAIN.com be your external name and DOMAIN.pvt (pvt
> > or prv, for private) internally. Some minimal extra smarts in bind to 
> > deal securely with private domains and off you go!
> > 
> > Thoughts?
> > 
> > jd
> 
> 	RFC 2606
> 		.test
> 		.example
> 		.invalid
> 		.localhost
> 	draft-ietf-dnsind-local-names-07.txt
> 		.local
> 
> -- 
> Joe Yao				jsdy at cospo.osis.gov - Joseph S. D. Yao
> COSPO/OSIS Computer Support					EMT-B
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
> This message is not an official statement of COSPO policies.

-- 
Joe Yao				jsdy at cospo.osis.gov - Joseph S. D. Yao
COSPO/OSIS Computer Support					EMT-B
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
This message is not an official statement of COSPO policies.