Setting up a Root name server

Michael Voight mvoight at cisco.com
Mon Sep 6 18:49:32 UTC 1999


I take it back.. nslookup DOES use resolv.conf
However, you can select a server not in resolv.conf

Michael

Michael Voight wrote:
> 
> chris wrote:
> > >
> > > Since when does using nslookup to query a root server have anything to do
> > > with local DNS setup,
> >
> > Since DNS was invented.
> > Funny, I thought you could run nslookup on a machine that has an empty
> > resolve.conf and still query a root server...
> >
> 
> nslookup doesn't use resolv.conf.
> 
> >
> > > A response NEVER came? Did you get a timeout message?
> > > What was the query?
> > >
> >
> > Yes, they timed out. I'm not trying to say that you can't always get a root
> > namesever I'm just saying that sometimes your resolver isn't going to be able to
> > reach it's first choice root name server(or second..).
> 
> How do you know what it's first choice was?? Nslookup doesn't show it.
> 
>  The guy that pointed this
> > out to me said to me in a kinda frantic voice "The name servers are down" .. My
> > first thought was how the hell did all my nameservers drop at once. He then
> > pointed out that he couldn't get a query off of 3 root servers in a row. We
> > checked pings and traceroutes to the servers to verify that it wasn't a network
> > problem.
> 
> How do you know if any of those nameservers were being used by the
> resolver? It usually pick the one with the fastest rtt.
> 
> > > > a root server on my network, and get our local nameserves to query it, and
> > > > have our customers nameservers query it, it will speed things up.
> 
> Ok, and if that root server is busy or down???
> 
> Michael


More information about the bind-users mailing list